You’re now chatting with a random stranger. Say hi!
Official messages from Omegle will not be sent with the label ‘Stranger:’. Strangers claiming to represent Omegle are lying.
You: they have about 60 hairs per folicle
You: i know, isnt that crazy?
Stranger: they look like funny little rabbit-gerbils
Stranger: have you ever seen them?
Stranger: You’re missing out
Stranger: Say you’re a man
Stranger: and you fall in love with a lesbian
Stranger: What the hell happens??
You: you just be sad then
You: and find another girl to fall in love with
Stranger: what if you’re a man
Stranger: and you’re straight
Stranger: and another man falls in love with you?
You: explain to them that you cannot return their feelings because you arent gay
Stranger: what if both situations happen together?
You: well then you do both
Stranger: that’s difficult
Stranger: are you a mormon?
You: dont know what that is either
Stranger: you’re a dirty christian activist
Stranger: you’re a dirty catholic proletariat
Stranger: you’re a dirty buddhist charlatan
Stranger: your belief-system
You: i believe in what can be proven
Stranger: you’re a dirty agnostic
Stranger: I think you are
You: god might exist but he might not, cant really be proven either way
Stranger: so you’re agnosti
You: maybe, but im not dirty
Stranger: you’re most likely dirty
You: im most definately not
Stranger: how do you know?
You: well what exactly do you mean by dirty anyways?
Stranger: I mean infected by grime
You: im not infected by grime
Stranger: how do you know?
You: how would i not know?
Stranger: you sure you’re not religious. Your arguments are striking similar
You: they may be but im arguing about a being thts existence can be proven
Stranger: prove your own existence please.
You: well only an actually person could respond in such ways as i have
Stranger: god could be doing it
Stranger: or my mind could be creating this situation
Stranger: and it’s a delusion
You: if your having delusions about arguing with a random stranger over the internet then you need to seek professional help
Stranger: you’re demeaning my argument. What I’ve said is certainly plausible, and you can’t prove that it’s not true
You: we must be having the same delusion then
Stranger: then you don’t exist
Stranger: and I don’t exist
You: well that sure makes life easier for me
You: well if i dont exist than i have nothing to worry about
You: no obligations or responsibilties, nor can i feel pain or anyhitng for that matter
Stranger: regardless of what the truth is you’ll continue living life as you were
Stranger: but you’re having the delusion that yuo do
Stranger: so your sensory perceptions would be exactly the same
Stranger: and you would remain in the exact same state
You: im just part of your delusion, once you come out of it i’ll be gone
Stranger: that’s nonsensical
Stranger: you must be a mystic
You: naw, im just a person who doesnt much care if gods and such exist or not, or if i die tomorrow
Stranger: so you have no preference whether or not you live or die
Stranger: that’s also absurd. you don’t even know what death is like. How can you reasonably be indifferent?
You: becaue i dont care what its like
Stranger: So you don’t give a damn about anything
Stranger: Why don’t you just die off like other lazy scoundrels
You: because i dont really want to kill myself
Stranger: but you don’t give a damn about anything
Stranger: you don’t want anything
You: there are things i want, but if i dont get them then its no bug deal
Stranger: doesn’t need to be a big deal
Stranger: just any deal at all
Stranger: and if you say even that’s null, then you never really want them
You: or maybe im just not as materialisctic as most people and can “want” things, instead of “needing” them
Stranger: the irony there is you’re assuming the only thing you might want are ‘materialistic’ things. And I would have to disagree.
You: well thing thing is no one “needs” anything
You: doesnt matter if its materialistic or not
Stranger: okay, if you want to say that survival is not intrinsically important, fine. We don’t need a damn thing. Fuck us all. But then you also lose the need for reason, the inherent value of logic, rational tought, etc.
Stranger: And by doing that you lose all frame of reference to anything we can possibly come to terms with
You: there is really no such thing as “needs”
You: no one needs to survive, they just want to
Stranger: but what I said above still stands
You: i dont see how it does
Stranger: if you don’t need to survive, then you have no need of anything that is valuable in survival. Our primary survival tool is our intellect, our ability to reason and foresee, to deduce ideas from logic, from extracting hyptheses and conclusions from observation
You: it seems you arent understanding me
You: we dont nee anything at all including logic and all that other stuff
Stranger: and that’s paradoxical, don’t you see?
Stranger: you’re saying “all reason, evidence, wisdom, etc. are useless”
Stranger: yet that is a piece of ‘wisdom,’ as it were
Stranger: so it’s useless
Stranger: and you’re back to nothing
Stranger: i.e. no frame of reference
You: why do we need a frame of reference?
Stranger: perhaps maybe you don’t, because you use something along the lines “perception is relative” or “all things are subjective” as a rationalization for the hatred of having the responsibility for actual living in a world where there are rules that we do have very good evidence for, albeit not *absolute* evidence. If you require *absolute* evidence, then, fine, nothing can be proved, and nothing can be derived, nor needed, nor wanted
Stranger: so you build yourself a sequestered sanctuary where you don’t have to use these things that rational people value
You: i dont see how wethere or not something can be proven changes whether or not we need it
You: doesnt matter how well something can be proven, in the end we dont need it
Stranger: see this is just absurd, because after having convinced yourself of this, you’re going to end this conversation and start living again like every other joe schmoe who really *does* value survival, and homeostatic emotion, and intellectual satisfaction
Stranger: you’re just being a heretic of argument
You: no im just telling you what i believe
Stranger: but you don’t truly believe it
Stranger: what you truly believe is what you use to decide how you act in your daily life
Stranger: and you act based on the value of survival, and the things I mentioned above
You: i said that i dont need anyhting, never really said i didnt want anything
You: in the end, nothing matters
Stranger: does what you say matter?
Stranger: “in the end, nothing matters.” — this statement doesn’t really matter
Stranger: so what the hell are you saying, philosopher?
You: yeah it doesnt matter, whats your point?
Stranger: you’re talking in nonsensical paradoxes, because you don’t have the capacity to argue in terms otherwise, or, like I said before, you have sequestered yourself in this metaphorical sanctuary where reason and logic and all other frames of reference are naught
Stranger: you have reduced yourself to a savage, tribal, mystic
Stranger: good, son. Good
You: but then again it doesnt really matte what you say
Stranger: according to you, no
Stranger: but you don’t know what the hell really matters
Stranger: because you talk and think in terms of paradox
Stranger: and that was a euphemism for saying you shouldn’t argue, because you’re stupid.
You: your resorting to insults and you say, i cant argue?
Stranger: there hasn’t been anything resembling a civic argument for quite some time
You: well you could be right, but what do i care?
Stranger: because at the end of the day, you really do care about what other people think, and I don’t represent the minority of intelligent people, and, I hope, you respect intelligent people rather than idiotts
You: no i odnt care what others think
Stranger: why do you talk to people on a chat server then? to admire the letters they type?
You: i come here out of boredom mostly
Stranger: so, in order not to be bored, you care what people think, even if it’s a means to an end
You: again i dont care what people think
You: doesnt matter what the person is saying, as long as we are having a conversation, i a content
Stranger: Let me comply with your request
Stranger: you motherfucking childish roach of the earth
You: thats not really a conversation
You: thats just spouting random words
Stranger: what do you care?
Stranger: you don’t give a damn
You: i dont but i just figured that you would give an example of an actually conversation
Stranger: remember, I don’t have to think in order to converse, apparently
Stranger: according to you
Stranger: f;ka;fafasdf;kajsdf?
You: since i said “conversation” and not “random words”
You: i dindt say you didnt have to think
Stranger: Yes, but what is conversation without thought/
Stranger: beacuse you managed to ruin conversation of that, too
You: you can think all you want, i just dont care about what your thoughts are
Stranger: you obviously care that I *do* think, though
Stranger: or else you wouldn’t mind gibberish
You: giberish is fine on occasion
You: also i was doing some word association with someone earlier
Stranger: How’s your dolphin today?
Stranger: I ate your dolphin
You: well thats not very nice at all
Stranger: How’s your donkey doing today?
You: he been a bit of an ass lately
Stranger: I roasted your ass over a hot fire
Stranger: How’s your gerbil doing this evening?
You: you arent very creative now are you?
Stranger: are you caring about my thoughts right now?
Stranger: I bet you were going to guess I ate your gerbil, too
You: im not caring about your thoughts no but i am caring about my entertainment
You: i did say i come here when im bored
Stranger: and you just cared that I think
Stranger: now what I tihnk
Stranger: so you should be content
Stranger: but obviously you’re not
Stranger: you’re a sad attempt at a hypocrite
You: in such a situation i disconnect then find somone who is interesting
You: i dont see how im hypocritical at all
You: your just twisting things around
Stranger: you’re hypocrtical in that you express beliefs you don’t really hold
You: how do i not hold them?
Stranger: we’ve gone over this
Stranger: here’s the easiest
Stranger: you say, what..
You: i dont think you understand my belief very well
Stranger: “everything is meaningless”
Stranger: “that statement is meaningless”
Stranger: and so on and so forth
You: again, i dont think you understand my belief very well
Stranger: again, I don’t think you’re rational enough to have a real system of beliefs. You’re an irrational narcissist as far as I’m concerned
Stranger: unless you can explain with some clarity and reason
You: you also haven’y been able to explain how im not holding true to my beliefs
Stranger: then you’re explanation is shy of reason and muddled in paradox
You: there is reason, just because you cant see it doesnt mean it isnt htere
Stranger: okay, let’s revisit. Please tell me your ‘beleifs’, succinctly please, and clearly.
You: people dont need anything, nothing really matters
Stranger: So let’s examine how that doesn’t make any damn sense
Stranger: “people don’t need anything, nothing really matters.” does this belief matter?
Stranger: no, because nothing really matters
Stranger: so your belief doesn’t matter to you
You: are you finished already?
You: well i dont see the problem
You: just because something is a paradox doesnt make it wrong
Stranger: so at one point, you say you believe that “people don’t need anything, nothing really matters,” and at the very next moment, you say that, no, you don’t really believe that your own believe matters
Stranger: So you are a hypocrite
You: thats not hypocritical
Stranger: don’t say you’re a fucking existentialist
You: i think you need to look at this whole thing a bit closer
Stranger: I don’t need anything
You: its not hypocritical
Stranger: how is it not? You say people don’t need anything. I’m a person. Now you say I need something
You: its more of an ifinite loop than a hypocrocy
You: its doesnt matter because it doesnt matter
You: and it just keeps going like that
Stranger: that’s recursion error
Stranger: that’s not making any damn sense
You: i didnt say you needed anything
Stranger: “you need to look at this whole tihng a bit closer”
You: i think you took that phrase a bit too literally
You: you also left out a bit
Stranger: and now you take back what you say, or change it’s meaning in retrospect of your error, or, perhaps, your newfound understanding of your nonsense
You: no im not changing its meaning
Stranger: then you are not talking to me clearly. You are speaking in deceiving drivel
Stranger: how was I supposed to interpret that?
Stranger: how I did, in fact, interpret it
You: poeple use the word need all the time, doesnt mean such needs exist
Stranger: but the people who use the word really believe that they need it, or aren’t using the word correctly
You: sure you “need to look closer to understandmy beliefs, but you dont “need to understand my beliefs
Stranger: so I still need something. That doesn’t show anything
You: but in the end that need leads to something that isnt needed
Stranger: according to you, again
You: like how you need to eat and drink to survive, but you dont need to survive
You: is it more clear now?
Stranger: I understand what you’re saying
Stranger: so the universe doesn’t need to exist
Stranger: Okay, fine. But then your conception of necessity is unavailing, since nothing is, by your definition, needed. But, see, now you’ve boiled it down to just muddled semantics. Fine. By *your* definition, we don’t need anything. But by *others* definition, where the need to survive and to be happy, and to have a medium/plane of existence is required for this to take place *is* necessary, then there certainly are things that are needed
You: nothing isnt really needed either
Stranger: I don’t know what that means. “nothing isn’t needed”
Stranger: we don’t need nothing?
You: i mean nothingness itself
Stranger: well that’s silly
You: not really, because nothingness is something
Stranger: nothingness, by identity, isn’t subject to anything
You: by giving a name and meaning to nothingness it becomes something
Stranger: it’s a word, an abstraction, a concept. Perhaps it *is* a non-physical thing, but we haven’t been talking about that sort of thing. Are you suggesting that nothing is a physical thing?
You: cant really say for sure, i think we are veering from our original topic
Stranger: by defnition, nothing is the absence of some thing
Stranger: it is void of ‘thing’
You: it might be, it might not be, dont really care
Stranger: see, this is what I struggle with
Stranger: your attituge toward your own beliefs is that you don’t care about your own beliefs
Stranger: if you don’t care about your own beliefs, than you, by default, hold to them at random
Stranger: and because your own beliefs don’t really matter, *and* you don’t care what they are or *that* they are, I fail to see why you even hold beliefs
You: i dont care about them because it doesnt matter
Stranger: yet you’ve just discussed them at length
Stranger: if you did hold to them at random, surely we couldn’t have discussed them for so long
Stranger: you would have switched to another nonsensical belief
Stranger: and we’d have moven on
You: or like i said before, i come here cause im bored, perhaps i was just doing this all for intertainment
Stranger: but your own entertainment doesn’t really mattered. And we’re back to the whole random shit, and you wouldn’t have stayed here this long if that were true
You: like i said though, nothing is needed, i still want things
Stranger: but your wants don’t really matter
You: if i dont get what i want by the time i die then i’ll be fine with that
Stranger: I don’t think you’re making the connection. If nothing is needed, then you have no need of wants. If nothing matters, then it doesn’t matter that you have no need of anything, and no need of wants. Clearly this ‘logic’ should indicate to you that, really, you have no true wants, true desires, true motivation, etc.
You: yet again i dont think you understand this
Stranger: respond to *my* point for once
Stranger: instead of supplying negative support for your own postulated belief that you don’t beleive
You: i believe, my belief just doesnt really matter
You: its hard to respond to your points, when you dont understand mine
Stranger: it’s hard…Okay, I do believe that, coming from your own perspective. But it’s certainly not impossible. Yet you’ve made no attempt
You: i’ve made plenty of attempts
Stranger: insincere attempts. You always retort, “Wahh, you don’t understand MY belief, therefore I don’t have to *defend* my belief in regards to your refutation, I only have to purport that you have no idea what my beliefs are, and, hopefuly if I hide behind that illusion for long enough, you’ll give up and I won’t ever, *ever* have to offer any explanation for my beliefs!”
Your conversational partner has disconnected.
(96 votes, score: 4.52)
Loading ...